Sunday, January 24, 2010

“I’m disappearing inch by inch into this house”

When the soul departs, then what remains is dead matter, a sheer material thing, which no longer possesses in itself anything of the I as man. The Body, on the contrary, cannot depart. Even the ghost necessarily has its ghostly Body. To be sure, this Body is not an actual material thing—the appearing materiality is an illusion—but thereby so is the affiliated soul and thus the entire ghost (Husserl, Ideas).
When the dead come, how will they be found? Ordinarily, we raise our eyes to the world, in the hope of catching sight of some amorphous spirit lurking in the distance. And we are able to “see” the dead, as even the most ethereal of ghosts retains spatio-temporal extension. Only now, that spirit is reduced to a murmur, a corpse whose life has detached itself from its original site of existence. But the supernatural realm does not end with our eyes, nor does it privilege visual perception. In the burnt out corridors of old houses left to decay, things creep up behind us, their hands meeting with our own, the voices heard through our bodies.


How do we find the dead? The question must be reversed: how do the dead find us? Lacking the necessary sensory organs we associate with the living, the supernatural are forced to the surface of their natural habitat, at which point human life is thought of as intervening with the otherworldly. Yet this is an illusion. The realm of the supernatural does not exist in an “elsewhere,” far removed from human habitation. Nor does human life fortuitously encounter the experience of being haunted, as though ghosts dwelt in a dormant province, only awoken by the creeping dread of human fear. Rather, when the dead come, then they do so alongside the living who reciprocates the troubled desires and memories, which fuse the living with the dead.


Of the failure to transcend death, Eliphas Levi writes as follows: “When a man has lived well the astral body evaporates like a pure incense ascending towards the superior regions; but should he have lived in sin, his astral body, which holds him prisoner, still seeks the objects of it is passions and wishes to return to life” (p. 120). A spiritual abyss ensues, the life-world of the dead now strung in a celestial void. That Levi points toward “sin” as the cause of this void need not matter. Removing the moral content of his claim, we are left with a desire toward returning, repetition, and reconstitution—a debt the dead owe the living. In certain pathological instances, that debt exceeds the bounds of an immaterial realm, at which point “the suffering souls sometimes enter the organism of the living and dwell therein in that state which Cabbalists term embryonic” (Ibid).


The dead are with us. But para-phenomenology rather than necromancy is required in order to cultivate their presence of those trapped in the desolate void. Levi points us in the right direction in claiming that the dead “reason only be reflecting our thoughts and our reveries” (p. 121). From encountering the ghost in its haunt, we cross into a shared realm, whereupon the living becomes the voice of the dead, mirroring the disturbances from beyond.


In a key scene from Robert Wise’s The Haunting (1963) [of which, the screenshots are captured], this shared space is expressed perfectly. “I’m coming apart a little at a time,” so says the vulnerable protagonist, Nell, whose neurosis, guilt, and alienation enables her to commune with the dead, “I’m disappearing inch by inch into this house.” This chiasmatic interplay is the vital spark preserving the dead from their death. A haunting is mutual: the haunted become the haunt, and the haunt becomes the haunted (pointing us in each way to Freud’s understanding of unheimlich). In the The Haunting, the interplay carries with it an unconscious teleology, which is realised through the role of the house. More than a backdrop, the house renders the communion of Nell and the spectre possible—a living breathing, sentient entity, whose pulsating door, deathly cold spots, and ominous stares is the nothing less than the “Astral Light” rendered flesh.


Believing that her redemption from life dwells within the house, Nell’s “disappearance” into the house is the logical outcome of what Levi terms a “waking somnambulism,” placing the dead alongside the living. By the end of the film, this somnambulism has seized the body of Nell, producing a set of animated gestures opposed to her rational concept of “self.” Whose hands are driving the wheel that plunges her into a tree, killing her on the spot? There is no clear answer to this. By this time, the woman and the house have fused, and the otherness of the ghost has effectively become assimilated within her bodily scheme, thus producing a teleology exorcising both the living and the dead from the same place. Resigned to her fate, a waxy serenity reminiscent of Bataille’s “ling chi” descends upon her face, the car thundering into a tree: “Something at last is really, really happening to me,” she utters before dying.


6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great film, btw! I'm not sure what your personal conclusion is on the matter, nor mine for THAT matter. I will say that I feel certain that my dear departed Father visited me the other night. It was a joyful thing, (not dark,) as was he. There don't seem to be concrete rules, nor even loose ones, to my observation. For example, I wish my Mother had "made manifest" to me in some observable way, but never once did.

Cheers to you!

MD

Dylan Trigg said...

Thanks, MD. I'm not sure of my conclusion, other than to say that my "sense" toward ghosts is not solely an academic matter. I take the supernatural seriously - more seriously than fobbing it off as a symptom for politics, culture, or any other repressed aspect of modern life. The supernatural needs to be on its terms, face-to-face.

"Uninvited" (1944) and "The Innocents" (1961) also provoking.

Hope all is well in Virginia.

Dylan

Nicola Masciandaro said...

Here's a nice collection of corroborative extracts on ghosts.

And do check out Agamben's Signature of All Things if you haven't already, as the ontology here is homologous.

"Levi points us in the right direction in claiming that the dead “reason only be reflecting our thoughts and our reveries” (p. 121). From encountering the ghost in its haunt, we cross into a shared realm, whereupon the living becomes the voice of the dead, mirroring the disturbances from beyond."

This points me further to a weird and maybe truer place where the ghost is recognized as an entity of excessive ordinariness.

Looking forward to the book!

Best,

Nicola

Dylan Trigg said...

Hi Nicola,

Thanks for the Agamben reference. That's helpful. As is the Baba. The onus on the body as "gross" ties up nicely with Plotinus on the undead in their attachment to the flesh.

As for Baba's " That is why I told you all not to go near the well where the laundryman committed suicide." My sense is that it is precisely in the uncloaked banality of daylight that the otherworldly becomes worldly. Two films from 1981 - "Possession" and "The Entity" - capture that prosaic haunting perfectly.

Hope all is well,

Dylan

a. said...

Dr. Trigg,

I love your blog. It is refreshing to read after wading through philosophy texts which use a more violent language (or, at least for me, being less familiar with the vocabulary).

I first ran across your blog while Googling (thesis!) for information about the vertigo one might experience in a vast, open space like the prairie. Your entry on the phenomenology of the anxious body popped up, and as I read it--and the dialogue which followed-- I nodded and noted and felt like I was finally understanding something and being understood.

I look forward to reading more of your writings. Thanks for being a presence here on the Web.

Amy E.

willson said...

The popular comment layout is common, so it is easily recognized scanning to post a comment. If the comment section is in a different format, then I am going to spend more time trying to decipher what everything means.
study abroad